<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lowkey digital studio &#187; music tech degree</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/tag/music-tech-degree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com</link>
	<description>portfolio web site of Nathan Wolek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:03:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pursuing NASM approval for an undergraduate music technology degree</title>
		<link>http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/2007/11/pursuing-nasm-approval-for-an-undergraduate-music-technology-degree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/2007/11/pursuing-nasm-approval-for-an-undergraduate-music-technology-degree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music tech degree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATMI 2007 National Conference in Salt Lake City, UT.
ABSTRACT &#8211; The National Association of Schools of Music (NASM) maintains a broad set of guidelines for music technology degrees.  Even after assembling the required resources to establish such a degree program, applying for NASM approval can seem like a daunting task.  This paper will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a title="ATMI 2007 website" href="http://atmionline.org/Conferences/Conf2007/">ATMI 2007 National Conference</a></em><em> in Salt Lake City, UT.</em></p>
<p>ABSTRACT &#8211; The <a title="NASM website" href="http://nasm.arts-accredit.org/">National Association of Schools of Music (NASM)</a> maintains a broad set of guidelines for music technology degrees.  Even after assembling the required resources to establish such a degree program, applying for NASM approval can seem like a daunting task.  This paper will discuss the questions to consider when establishing an undergraduate music technology degree program, distill the NASM proposal formatting requirements into an easy to follow format, and detail the process of preparing for plan approval.   The author will illustrate specific points with descriptive accounts from of his recent experience preparing a successful NASM application to establish a Bachelor of Music in Music Technology.</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="ATMI 2007 NASM paper" href="http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/docs/wolek_atmi2007.pdf">Download Paper in PDF</a> &#8211; 280 kb</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/2007/11/pursuing-nasm-approval-for-an-undergraduate-music-technology-degree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music technology in higher education: different models, common issues and future trends</title>
		<link>http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/2003/10/music-technology-in-higher-education-different-models-common-issues-and-future-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/2003/10/music-technology-in-higher-education-different-models-common-issues-and-future-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 02:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music tech degree]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATMI 2003 National Conference in Miami, FL.
Co-authored with Peter V. Swendsen.
EXCERPT &#8211; Programs in music technology certainly have individual approaches to teaching their students, emphasizing different aspects of the field in their curriculum.  However, the differences are magnified in part by the multiplicity names these departments and research centers use to identify themselves.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="ATMI 2003 website" href="http://atmionline.org/Conferences/Conf2003/Conference2003.htm"><em>ATMI 2003 National Conference</em></a><em> in Miami, FL.</em></p>
<p>Co-authored with <a title="Peter Swendsen's website" href="http://www.swendsen.net/">Peter V. Swendsen</a>.</p>
<p>EXCERPT &#8211; Programs in music technology certainly have individual approaches to teaching their students, emphasizing different aspects of the field in their curriculum.  However, the differences are magnified in part by the multiplicity names these departments and research centers use to identify themselves.  Names and acronyms such as CCRMA, TIMARA, iEAR and CARTAH come to mind.  With their differences in the foreground, it can be difficult to see what they have in common beneath the surface.  This paper will examine the differences between specific music technology programs in an attempt to identify the similarities in their approaches to the topic, as well as common issues that face these programs.  We will also synthesize our observations about these programs and attempt to develop a theory for comparing these emphases within the field.  Based on our findings and conclusions, we will then turn our discussion to how technology can act as a hub for arts pedagogy as a whole and not just music.</p>
<p>One question that we should address before diving into the topic is our motivation as authors and the unique perspective our experience allows us to bring to the topic.  We are both, admittedly, young scholars at the beginning of our academic careers.  But we are also part of a newer breed of students that have been able to pursue music technology as our subject of primary interest throughout our student careers.  We were able to seek degrees up to the PhDs that we currently pursue that fall under the umbrella of music technology, a relatively new phenomenon for our field.  It is from this perspective that we present our findings, as students who had to search through the myriad of schools offering programs fairly recently in order to choose the best fit for ourselves.  We also present this paper as young academics, finding our way in our chosen field of study, and humbly submit it to those more established in the field in the hopes that it will encourage more dialog on these issues.</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="AMTI 2003 paper" href="http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/docs/wolekswendsen_atmi2003.pdf">Download Paper in PDF</a> &#8211; 148 kb</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/2003/10/music-technology-in-higher-education-different-models-common-issues-and-future-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

